Ante Pavic vs Lukas Lacko Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L L L L
Form
L L W L L L W L L LHead-2-Head: Pavic 1 - 0 Lacko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pavic winning 2 and Lacko winning 0. The last match between Pavic and Lacko was at the Ortisei Challenger, 09-10-2018, First, I.hard with Ante Pavic getting the victory 7-6(7) 7-6(16).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ante Pavic | 1 |
| Lukas Lacko | 0 |
| Pavic | Stats | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 132 | Highest Rank | 44 |
| 36 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 22 |
| 53% (332-296) | Career Total W/L | 55% (577-464) |
| $131,060 | Career Prize Money | $1,311,655 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 7-6(16) |
Stats 
Ante Pavic
Player
Lukas Lacko
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
26
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
24%
(
22 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
22 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 26 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:51:14 | Average Match Time | 1:51:14 |
| 65% (59/91) | 1st Serve % | 58% (50/86) |
| 85% (50/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (42/50) |
| 59% (19/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (22/36) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 26% (22/86) | Return Points Win % | 24% (22/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ante Pavic vs Lukas Lacko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pavic 1 - 0 Lacko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lacko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lacko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lacko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lacko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 125/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 95/ 111). Lacko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 232/ 173), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 80/ 95).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pavic winning 1 times and Lacko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pavic winning 2 and Lacko winning 0. The last match between Pavic and Lacko was at the Ortisei Challenger, 09-10-2018, First, I.hard with Ante Pavic getting the victory 7-6(7) 7-6(16).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pavic and Lacko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pavic winning 0 times and Lacko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Pavic winning 2, and Lacko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lacko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lacko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lacko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ante Pavic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Novikov
Player
Ante Pavic
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
10
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
91%
(
40 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
18 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(7) 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Ante Pavic
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
85)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guilherme Clezar
Player
Ante Pavic
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Ante Pavic
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sadio Doumbia
Player
Ante Pavic
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
47
Total Points Won
37
|
7-6(0) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ante Pavic
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ante Pavic
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
112)
18
Aces
23
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
69 of
80)
78%
(
32 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
26 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
25 of
112)
116
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Baptiste Crepatte
Player
Ante Pavic
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Ante Pavic
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ante Pavic
Player
Skander Mansouri
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Lacko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 5-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Lukas Lacko
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
13
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Lukas Lacko
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Lacko
Player
Alexander Donski
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Marcora
Player
Lukas Lacko
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrej Martin
Player
Lukas Lacko
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Lukas Lacko
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
107)
6
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Lacko
Player
Alexander Ritschard
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Lukas Lacko
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Lukas Lacko
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
38 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Pavic vs Lacko?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Pavic Vs Lacko is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (332/296) | Win/Loss | 55% (577/464) |
| 52% (753/690) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1361/1171) |
| 51% (7239/6850) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (12617/11895) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 3137 | Aces Total | 4632 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1314 | Total Double Faults | 1611 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 582.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 589.02 |
| 60% (14914/25029) | 1st Serve % | 60% (30980/51540) |
| 76% (11282/14914) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (22550/30980) |
| 50% (5016/10115) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10575/20560) |
| 36% (748/2098) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1689/4261) |
| 36% (9074/25405) | Return Points Win % | 36% (18391/51131) |
| 53% (325/612) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (537/951) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (34/81) |
| 45% (118/260) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (200/390) |
| 52% (97/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (181/342) |
| 86% (316/272) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (564/471) |
| 14% (316/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (564/93) |
| 19% (312/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (476/104) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
